Minnesota Timberwolves
Minnesota Timberwolves
NBA
·
2025-26 Season
·
#6 Conference
| #3 Division
Home: 26-15
·
Road: 23-18
·
Net Rtg: +3.1
Minnesota Timberwolves Overall Shot Dashboard Team shooting efficiency by shot distance and type.
FGA
87.5
FG%
48.1%
eFG%
55.9%
2P FGA
50.7
2P FG%
56.2%
3P FGA
36.8
3P FG%
36.9%
Minnesota Timberwolves FG% by Shot Type Shooting accuracy across catch-and-shoot, pull-up, and close-range attempts.
Minnesota Timberwolves FGA Volume by Shot Type How many field goal attempts come from each shot type per game.
Minnesota Timberwolves Catch & Shoot Shooting stats on catch-and-shoot attempts where the player receives and shoots without dribbling.
FGA
24.2
FGM
9.4
FG%
38.7%
eFG%
57.2%
3PA
23.4
3P%
38.6%
Minnesota Timberwolves Pull-Up Shooting Shooting stats on pull-up attempts where the player takes at least one dribble before shooting.
FGA
26.4
FGM
10.4
FG%
39.5%
eFG%
47.9%
3PA
13.2
3P%
33.8%
Minnesota Timberwolves Close Range (< 10ft) Shooting stats on attempts within 10 feet of the basket.
FGA
36.5
FGM
22.1
FG%
60.6%
eFG%
60.6%
3PA
0.0
3P%
—
Minnesota Timberwolves Shooting by Zone Team FG% and volume broken down by court zone: restricted area, paint, mid-range, corner 3, above-break 3.
| Zone | FGM | FGA | FG% | % of FGA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted Area | 17.8 | 26.1 | 68.1% | — |
| Paint (Non-RA) | 7.4 | 16.4 | 45.0% | — |
| Mid-Range | 3.7 | 8.8 | 41.9% | — |
| Left Corner 3 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 39.5% | — |
| Right Corner 3 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 37.4% | — |
| Above Break 3 | 10.1 | 27.6 | 36.5% | — |
| Corner 3 | 3.7 | 9.6 | 38.5% | — |
| Backcourt | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — |
Minnesota Timberwolves Opponent Shooting by Zone (Defense) What this team allows opponents to shoot by zone. Lower FG% is better defense.
No zone data available.
Minnesota Timberwolves Shooting by Distance (5ft Range) Shooting efficiency broken down by 5-foot distance increments from the basket.
| Distance | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 9 Ft. | 4.3 | 9.8 | 43.5% |
| Less Than 5 Ft. | 19.2 | 29.2 | 65.7% |
| 10 14 Ft. | 3.4 | 7.3 | 47.1% |
| 15 19 Ft. | 1.7 | 4.1 | 41.8% |
| 20 24 Ft. | 6.5 | 17.2 | 37.9% |
| 25 29 Ft. | 7.4 | 20.4 | 36.0% |
| 30 34 Ft. | 0.2 | 0.6 | 34.9% |
| 35 39 Ft. | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 40+ Ft. | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Minnesota Timberwolves Opponent Shooting by Distance (Defense) What opponents shoot by distance range against this team.
| Distance | FGM | FGA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 9 Ft. Opp | 4.7 | 11.0 | 42.9% |
| Less Than 5 Ft. Opp | 18.8 | 30.9 | 60.9% |
| 10 14 Ft. Opp | 3.6 | 8.2 | 44.3% |
| 15 19 Ft. Opp | 1.8 | 4.6 | 38.7% |
| 20 24 Ft. Opp | 5.9 | 16.0 | 36.9% |
| 25 29 Ft. Opp | 6.4 | 18.4 | 34.7% |
| 30 34 Ft. Opp | 0.2 | 0.6 | 27.7% |
| 35 39 Ft. Opp | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 40+ Ft. Opp | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Minnesota Timberwolves shoot by zone?
- The Shooting tab breaks down Minnesota Timberwolves' field goal attempts and percentages by court zone: restricted area, paint (non-RA), mid-range, left corner 3, right corner 3, and above-the-break 3. Zone data reveals whether a team relies on rim attacks, mid-range, or perimeter shooting.
What is eFG% in basketball?
- Effective field goal percentage (eFG%) adjusts FG% to account for three-pointers being worth more than two-pointers. The formula is: eFG% = (FGM + 0.5 x 3PM) / FGA. A team shooting 45% FG with many threes may have a higher eFG% than a team shooting 48% from mostly two-point range.
What is the difference between catch-and-shoot and pull-up shooting?
- Catch-and-shoot attempts are shots taken without dribbling — the player receives a pass and immediately shoots. Pull-up shots require at least one dribble before shooting. Teams with high catch-and-shoot efficiency typically have strong off-ball movement and spacing; high pull-up efficiency indicates skilled shot creators.