MLB Batting Splits 2025
Performance splits by handedness, home/away, and situational categories.
| Player | Team | Split | AB | H | HR | RBI | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS ▼ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Lead Off Inning | 41 | 8 | 1 | 1 | .195 | .267 | .293 | .559 | |
|
Runners On | 21 | 4 | 0 | 4 | .190 | .320 | .238 | .558 | |
  |
Scoring Position | 81 | 20 | 0 | 19 | .247 | .274 | .284 | .558 | |
 |
Scoring Position, 2 out | 55 | 9 | 1 | 10 | .164 | .303 | .255 | .558 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 48 | 10 | 1 | 1 | .208 | .224 | .333 | .558 | |
 |
Scoring Position | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 | .200 | .357 | .200 | .557 | |
 |
None On | 68 | 12 | 1 | 1 | .176 | .291 | .265 | .556 | |
 |
None On | 296 | 62 | 3 | 3 | .209 | .264 | .291 | .555 | |
 |
Lead Off Inning | 100 | 21 | 2 | 2 | .210 | .275 | .280 | .555 | |
 |
Runners On | 58 | 9 | 2 | 9 | .155 | .261 | .293 | .554 | |
 |
None On | 203 | 43 | 2 | 2 | .212 | .249 | .305 | .554 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 131 | 29 | 1 | 1 | .221 | .271 | .282 | .554 | |
|
None On | 32 | 5 | 1 | 1 | .156 | .270 | .281 | .552 | |
|
Scoring Position, 2 out | 70 | 11 | 3 | 20 | .157 | .224 | .329 | .552 | |
 |
Lead Off Inning | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .310 | .240 | .550 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 62 | 11 | 3 | 4 | .177 | .227 | .323 | .550 | |
 |
Runners On | 22 | 3 | 1 | 3 | .136 | .231 | .318 | .549 | |
 |
Scoring Position, 2 out | 50 | 9 | 0 | 13 | .180 | .328 | .220 | .548 | |
|
Scoring Position | 34 | 8 | 0 | 11 | .235 | .282 | .265 | .547 | |
|
Runners On | 28 | 4 | 0 | 6 | .143 | .368 | .179 | .547 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 32 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .219 | .265 | .281 | .546 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 52 | 8 | 3 | 3 | .154 | .200 | .346 | .546 | |
|
None On | 150 | 33 | 2 | 2 | .220 | .245 | .300 | .545 | |
|
Scoring Position, 2 out | 36 | 5 | 1 | 7 | .139 | .295 | .250 | .545 | |
|
None On | 106 | 20 | 2 | 2 | .189 | .252 | .292 | .545 | |
 |
Runners On | 56 | 11 | 1 | 9 | .196 | .277 | .268 | .545 | |
|
Runners On | 44 | 8 | 0 | 9 | .182 | .294 | .250 | .544 | |
 |
Runners On | 42 | 8 | 0 | 7 | .190 | .306 | .238 | .544 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 102 | 20 | 3 | 3 | .196 | .219 | .324 | .543 | |
|
Runners On | 84 | 16 | 1 | 12 | .190 | .293 | .250 | .543 | |
 |
Scoring Position | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | .154 | .313 | .231 | .543 | |
 |
Scoring Position | 18 | 4 | 0 | 7 | .222 | .263 | .278 | .541 | |
  |
Lead Off Inning | 38 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .184 | .225 | .316 | .541 | |
|
Scoring Position, 2 out | 64 | 12 | 1 | 14 | .188 | .212 | .328 | .540 | |
|
None On | 88 | 17 | 1 | 1 | .193 | .245 | .295 | .540 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 69 | 14 | 2 | 2 | .203 | .236 | .304 | .540 | |
|
None On | 106 | 20 | 1 | 1 | .189 | .295 | .245 | .540 | |
|
Runners On | 103 | 18 | 3 | 15 | .175 | .277 | .262 | .539 | |
|
Scoring Position | 40 | 9 | 0 | 10 | .225 | .289 | .250 | .539 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 35 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .282 | .257 | .539 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 39 | 7 | 1 | 1 | .179 | .256 | .282 | .538 | |
|
Lead Off Inning | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .231 | .231 | .308 | .538 | |
|
None On | 115 | 25 | 0 | 0 | .217 | .250 | .287 | .537 | |
|
None On | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | .172 | .226 | .310 | .536 | |
|
None On | 95 | 19 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .240 | .295 | .535 | |
|
None On | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | .172 | .294 | .241 | .535 | |
|
None On | 122 | 23 | 2 | 2 | .189 | .272 | .262 | .534 | |
|
Runners On | 77 | 12 | 3 | 14 | .156 | .235 | .299 | .534 | |
|
None On | 75 | 10 | 5 | 5 | .133 | .188 | .347 | .534 | |
 |
Scoring Position, 2 out | 15 | 2 | 1 | 4 | .133 | .133 | .400 | .533 |
Understanding Situational Splits
Situational splits capture a hitter's performance in high-leverage game contexts — runners in scoring position (RISP), two-out situations, and clutch at-bats. These splits reveal which hitters elevate their game when it matters most.
RISP (Runners in Scoring Position)
RISP splits show how a hitter performs with runners on 2nd and/or 3rd. Some hitters elevate with RISP while others tighten up. For prop betting, high RISP splits indicate a hitter who thrives under pressure and may exceed their base projections in run-producing situations.
Two-Out Situations
Two-out hitting is a specific skill. Hitters who maintain high averages with 2 outs extend innings and create run-scoring opportunities. The "scoring position, 2 out" split is the ultimate clutch metric — it captures rally-extending at-bats under maximum pressure.
DFS & Betting Value
Situational splits help identify "clutch" hitters whose RBI and run totals outpace their overall stat line. A hitter with elite RISP splits batting 4th or 5th in a potent lineup is a prime RBI prop target. These splits also help explain why some hitters consistently outperform their projections.
Related MLB Tools
MLB Park Factors
Stadium effects on hitting and pitching
Batter vs Pitcher Matchups
Head-to-head historical batting stats
MLB Player Props Today
Today's best prop bets with projections
Hits Props
MLB hits prop lines and projections
DraftKings MLB Optimizer
Build optimized MLB DFS lineups
MLB DFS Stacks
Top hitter stacks for today's slate
Data Source & Methodology
Batting splits sourced from MLB Stats API. Stats reflect current season data and update daily as games are played.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is clutch hitting a real skill?
- This is debated, but the evidence suggests that while most clutch performance is random variation, some hitters do have a repeatable ability to perform in high-leverage situations. Hitters with consistently high RISP splits across multiple seasons are more likely to have a real skill than those with one hot year.
- How do I use RISP splits for prop betting?
- Target hitters with strong RISP splits for RBI props, especially when they bat in the middle of a potent lineup. If the lineup around them gets on base frequently, a high-RISP hitter will have more opportunities to drive in runs. Combine with the opposing pitcher's RISP-allowed stats for the clearest edge.
- What is the "scoring position, 2 out" split?
- This is arguably the highest-pressure regular-season at-bat situation — runners on 2nd/3rd with 2 outs. Hitters who thrive here extend innings and produce outsized run totals. It's a small-sample split, so look for consistency across seasons rather than relying on one year's data.